St. Thomas Aquinas
The
1. We can see that some things in
the world are in motion (the change from potential to actual). E. g., Wood is
potentially hot, fire is actually hot.
2. Nothing can be both potential
and actual at the same time, in the same respect. (E.g., the wood cannot be both potentially
hot and actually hot at the same time.)
3. Therefore, it is impossible
that a thing can be both mover (the thing bringing about the change) and moved
(the thing changed), in the same respect, at the same time.
4. Therefore, whatever is put in
motion must be put in motion by some other actualized thing, and that by some
prior actualized thing, and so on, and so on.
(E., g., the wood cannot set itself on fire. The wood must be set on fire by some thing
which is already hot.),
5. No infinite regress of causes-otherwise there
would be no first mover and so, no subsequent movers.
6. Therefore, there must be a
Prime Mover, Unmoved Mover, which everyone
understands to be God
1. We see in the world an order of
efficient causes.
2. If a thing were to be its own
efficient cause, it would be prior to itself (it would have to exist before it
exists-it would exist and not exist at the same time) that’s impossible or
absurd.
3. So, nothing can be its own
efficient cause. (by reductio ad absurdum)
4. The first cause is the cause of
the intermediate, and that of the ultimate cause.
5. To take away a cause is to take
away its effect.
6. So, if
it is possible to go to infinity with efficient causes, there would be no first
efficient cause.
7. If there were no first efficient cause, there
would be no intermediate efficient causes.
8. There are intermediate efficient causes
(we see them in the world). These intermediate causes are effects of prior
efficient causes (We just denied the consequent of 7. By two steps of Modus Tollens we get-9 and 10)
9. So, there cannot be an infinite
regress of efficient causes.
10.
Therefore,
there must be a first efficient cause, to which everyone gives the name of God.
1. In nature we find that things
are generated and destroyed (corrupted).
2. So, they are contingent
(possible to be and not be)
3. That which is contingent at
some point does not exist (is not).
4. So, it is impossible for
contingent things to always exist.
5. Therefore, if
everything were contingent,
at some point there would have been nothing. (nothing could have existed.)
6. That which begins to exist is
brought into existence by something which already exists (He assumes Ex nihilo nihil
fit – Latin, “Nothing can be produced from nothing” and what he has
deduced in the 1st and 2nd ways.)
7. Therefore, if at
one time nothing were in existence, there would not be anything now!
8. That is absurd. (So, If you assume that
everything is contingent, you are led to the absurdity that nothing now exists
but, of course things do exist). Reductio ad Absurdum.
9. (So, it can’t be
true that everything is contingent)
10.
(
or, we could get there by saying ‘Something does exist now!’ By Modus Tollens denial
of the consequent of 7, leads to “So, there was no time in which nothing
existed.” )
11.
(“so,
there was no time when nothing existed” is a denial of the consequent of 5. So,
we could conclude ‘Hence, it is not the case that
everything is contingent’ – another Modus
Tollens.)
12.
Therefore,
there must be a necessary being.
13.
No
infinite regress of necessary beings
14.
Therefore,
there must be a necessary being having its own necessity, and this all men speak of as God.