World Literature II
Dr. Ramirez
Marguerite Duras (Donnadieu)
Born in 1914 and died in 1996
Playwright, novelist, screenwriter,
and social critic.
Graduated from Lycee de Saigon
Graduated from University of Paris;
license in law and political science; also studied mathematics. Had one
son.
Wrote The Sea Wall, The
Lover (originally 1971)
Marguerite Duras' The Lover.
Duras pays a great deal of attention
to writing in her novel. When does she mention writing? What
prospects does she face when she tells her mother? Make sure you use a
quote and explain its significance.
Themes/ideas/images
-
The desire to write is a frustrated
one. The mother calls writing nonsense, it is not "real work" 21
-
Once the narrator gets her math degree,
the mother is done with her daughter. After that, the narrator can
go on to do as she pleases
-
The narrator goes to France to be educated
and to get free from her family
-
Metropolis: Paris versus the Colony:
French Indochina (Vietnam)
-
Representation of colonialism (Do,
the servant who the elder brother tries to rape but who, nevertheless,
stays with the narrator's mother)
-
Colonial relations: the narrator has
priveleges--she sits in the white section of the bus (French colonials
and the Vietnamese)
-
The lover is an outsider--he is Chinese
and lives in French colonial Indochina. He is also an outsider to
his own family because he is educated, in part, in France.
-
He is wealthy--his father makes money
in real estate
-
The narrator is an outsider and poor--although
she maintains the image of being priveleged--servant, they could refuse
the slop that was served to them
-
Mother subject to depression and is
a teacher; she moves around; no father figure--only one income. She makes
poor investments (property in Cambodia--water is encroaching upon the land,
making it difficult to harvest rice)
-
The elder brother--abusive to the younger
brother and he gambles. Has a possible addiction to Opium
-
Love and hatred in her writing in regard
to her family--before she had to be cautious (7 *8)
-
Unreliable narrator 27
-
Memory is unreliable
-
Revision of when the narrator met the
Chinese lover--it was not at a bar as she had written before
-
Narrator excels in French (literature
and culture)
-
Most important theme: memory and loss
-
Use of contraries--hat allows the narrator
to cross boundaries (those of gender; those dividing innocence and experience;
adolescence and adulthood (and therefore sexuality)
-
Ways of being, the creation of a distinct
image and identity
-
Family relations are difficult and
violent
-
Elder brother has assumed male parental
role
-
Narrator fears her elder brother's
sexuality and abilty to attract
-
Elder brother tries to rape Do, the
house servant and companion of the mother
Settings
Sadec-where the family lives, where
the mother teaches
Saigon-where the narrator attends
the Lycee and where she boards (in a state school)
Mekong-the river that takes the
narrator and the lover from Sidec to Saigon (about 100 miles)
Paris-the apartment where the narrator writes and the
city where she spent WWII
Characters
The nameless narrator
Paulo--brother
Elder brother
Marie Legrand--mother
The Chinese Lover
Helene
As you read, think about
-
The importance of photography and memory
-
The narrator's face--reveals a loss
of innocence
-
River imagery
-
The importance of writing and memory
-
How is the narrator unmarriageable
and what does this mean for her family?
-
The family benefits from the lover's
money
-
The lover takes them out to expensive
restaurants
-
Lover is potentially a father figure
-
He is an outsider--the brothers don't
speak with him; they hardly look at him
-
Prostitution
-
Lover doesn't think marriage is viable--both
b/c of his father and because of his own pride
-
How are both the narrator and the Chinese
lovers outcasts?
-
Keep this story and film in mind to
compare with Indochine.
Issues in Essays:
-
passive voice
-
past tense
-
expletives
-
lack of integration of quotes
-
poor documentation of texts
-
too much plot
-
no transitions or transitions that
don't work
-
few examples to support thesis
-
too little of analysis (3 instead of
4 pages)
-
misreading of narratives and their
details
-
misidentification of texts (play and
a novel)
-
not sufficient revision from the peer
critiques
sloppy writing (no proofreading)